1st Response to the book "The American Political Tradition: And the Men Who Made it" by Richard Hofstadter

I found the text dense and difficult to read due to vocabulary. As I worked my way through the new words and deciphered the meaning behind the prose, I developed a new understanding of the Founding Fathers and their motivations. I have to say that their motivations make sense when their personal histories are included. However, they are nonetheless surprising to my unsuspecting mind. Public primary and secondary school do not prepare students to understand our political history in its realistic rather than idealistic form.

I found it strangely comforting and disconcerting that the same comments and arguments are alive today in American politics. Have we not evolved in our philosophies, our ideals? Thomas Jefferson appears to be naïve to think that rewriting a constitution every twenty-five years would be necessary because of our evolution of ideas. We would most likely come up with a similar constitution today as we did in 1776. Or worse, we would sway drastically between ideologies from quarter century to quarter century, as we do every four to eight years. Although, having our countrymen focus on the meaning and form of their constitution periodically throughout their lives may arouse the apathetic to action.

Interestingly, an understanding of the vocabulary is not necessary to form your own opinion of how government should work and how citizens should be involved. My new vocabulary reinforces my opinions by giving them labels from historic movements or schools of thought. In a way, it legitimizes those views and explains the views of my opponents or identifies my natural opponents by linking together ideas my mind had not connected. For instance, a person with currently popular conservative views might naturally be an anti-intellectual. This helps to explain the endless astonishment I experience at the outrageous comments from my aunt regarding her view of society.

At best, I hope this class prepares me to more critically consider the statements of political figures and follow political conversations without being derailed by outlandish statements that I should have known were related. At worst, I will consider myself confident in political discourse and find myself in political arguments that I lack the ability to articulate, as I do now.